The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Underpowered 240---might have found the cause 200 1989

I hope that I did not send a message to the effect that you should modify the snorkel. I simply stated that while I had the intake system apart, I had noticed that the snorkel appeared to be restrictive when compared to the rest of the intake system. I elected to only do away with the heat stove portion of the air cleaner, and not modify the snorkel. I'm not a trained person in the field of fluid dynamics, but it seem to be pure common sense that a restriction of that magnitude would impede performance. I understand that harmonics and pressure wave length and a venturi effect also comes into play. For me, it was enough for those who are far more conversant in the lore of the Brick to say leave it alone. I haven't checked my 0-60 time since I modified the heat flapper on mine (don't have an hourglass). I was not looking to improve the performance at any rate, I was just trying to not kill off another expensive AMM sensor.

Bill






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.