The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

i think 900 1993

This is the kind of confirmation I was looking for, and why I posted the full details. Sometimes simple logic doesn't hold true, but if your experience has been that these results don't point to the cat, I'll look elsewhere.

I've always had a hard time doing the "definitive test" to prove or disprove that there are vacuum leaks. Just re-read the FAQ, and I guess I'll try Bruce's propane method, but I'd much prefer to be able to isolate sections and use pressure leakdown (that's how I did the turbo/intercooler tests).

Any thoughts on whether the failed tank pump may affect this?

I'll do the FAQ O2 sensor tests too, but I would have thought that this might also affect the HC and CO readings adversely. Simple and quick enough confirmation, regardless.

Thanks for the input,

David

--
David Armstrong - '86 240(350k km?), '93 940T(270k km), '89 240(parts source for others) near Toronto






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.