The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

71 vs later 120-130 1967

Ah, that explains the sensors. Can I assume that the engines with this later style sensor setup are B20F motors?

From what little I've read about the different years, the 72 had a more efficient fuel delivery - not squirting fuel into the combustion chambers when the pistons were down - or something like that... I think I read that in a back issue of "Rolling"

If I installed an ECU from a 1972, could I benfit from that improvement or would it not work because the 72 used this later style trigger you describe?

Incidentally, there is/was something wrong with the ECU for my system. It has a separate IPD fuel mixture control which is external to the ECU. JohnMC can say a lot more about it - as he put it in. I think there was an issue specifically with the cold start. Personally, I never had any trouble and I drove the car for 8-10 months before I began to disassemble it.










USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.