The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

71 vs later 120-130 1967

There's not really all that much difference in the performance/fuel economy between a 71 and a 72 (I've put many miles on both, and got 22 city, 30 highway, pretty consistently, both with M41) and what difference there is is due to higher compression, better porting etc. on the earlier engine.

If your 70 ECU is working correctly, there is no reason to change it to a 72, which is not a straightforward swap. While both units perform the same functions, and use all the same components EXCEPT the cold start valve (which is 5V on 70-71 and 12V on 72-73) the main wiring connector on the ECU is laid out very differently. You could either figure out what each wire does and move them to the correct locations in the connector block, and wire up the thermo-time switch from scratch or, if you can find one, change the whole injection harness to the later type.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.