The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Checked a few things 200 1989

art-if i saw the upper trace-main pump-and not read the rest, i would've said-needs a main pump. funny the mis-wired feed pump did this. but, the main pump was pulling against a pulling feed pump, so the strain would show up. would like to see the main pump trace after the re-repair.

why the resistor for the amp draw test? because of the scope? looks digital. i've just used a dvom and an inductive pickup for the draw test. i've only scoped a couple of pumps. noisy, with a changing draw and no cavitation made me look at the trace.

looks like you nailed it. good job, chuck.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.