The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Nice 164E - incredibly nice 164!! 140-160 1975

It's not your imagination that the '75 feels slow. They are definetely not as lively as the earlier versions. The addition of the vacuum and air pumps sap power and the '75 weigh more. The past couple of years I've scrapped a number of cars and looked to maximize the value. Do you realize, that between them, the front and rear bumpers on those early 240 based (incl the 164) weigh nearly 70 lbs. Forty-four lbs of aluminum, twenty-two lbs of rubber-the rest in hardware--not to mention the mounting brackets. That's 2 percent of the vehicle weight. Getting rid of the bumpers would net you the same as an additional 3hp! The early 164 bumpers aren't particularly protective--but they sure look better and don't weigh nearly as much. The '72 164E with OD I owned felt like a rocket compared to the '69 4-speed and the '73 auto we also drove.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.