The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Manifolds 140-160

Another chance for those watching my "performance" rebuild to weigh in judiciously.

My now 10.4 to 1 B20E, with dual v-springs medium lift cam and twin mikunis needs manifolds...I have a pre air pump integral for carbs, a pre '68 shorty aluminum intake, and a FI exhaust (ceramic coated).

Easist swap is the integral, which has my current and fairly well working throttle linkage.

Any opinions as to whether there is a performance difference between the two setups? Integral VS. Shorty + FI. I note the balance tube on the integral is about twice the diameter of the one on the shorty intake.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.