The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

How bad is this? 140-160 1969

OK, I'm going to be the dissenting voice here. There are other early 140's around, and some of them will have a lot less rust. As others have said, what can happen is that you calculate $$$$ and time based on what you can see, and when the body guy or you get into it you find much more damage.

I speak from the two experiences of a Duett that just got out from 2 years at the body shop, and a lovely garage kept '67 140 with no body rust at all, that was $500. It had developed rust pinholes in the gas tank, so it couldn't be shown to run. My purchase was based on faith in the fixablility of the B18, and I was driving it a week later...

Scary rust pictures, including rat nest in the spare tire well (!) available:

140 on a trip: http://picasaweb.google.com/53Bentlley/Sept09TripToColmbiaGorge?authkey=Gv1sRgCLuftaKZit2EYA#

Duett rust:http://picasaweb.google.com/53Bentlley/Restoration1#






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.