The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Catalytic Converter Junk Science 200

I didn't want to get into it a lot, but I agree on the "recycled" versus "new" vehicles.

But ideally a modern fuel system in an older car is the best of both worlds; for example, the modern injected engine in a 1965 Volvo 122 that I'm building.

A modern catalytic converter is a cheap device to put on even an old car and has minimal effect on the running/backpressure/etc (barring the modern style of feeding it versus just running it at reduced efficiency).

So I've got no problem with putting cats on cars. I don't like gutting an emissions system for perceived better operation. The dark days of the 80s are long gone and cars can be run cleanly without being horrible messes of wiring and vacuum lines and unusual widgets. Clean can be powerful and reliable.

I just hate the CARS they're putting newer engines in.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.