The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Converting 2.4 to 3.1. What do I have to replace? 200 1990

The 3.1 stick cars were always a curiosity to me until I bought one. Prior to that I've owned both 2.2 and 2.4 M47 cars. My experience is that the 3.1 returns better mileage. Best I've been able to obtain in mostly-steady-state cruise with an M47 2.4 car is 28.25 over a six month test period. 88 LH2.2 M47 did 29. However the 3.1 car delivers a rock solid and very reliable 29.5 and I have seen 30 through Nebraska/Kansas terrain.

Not that .5 to 1 mpg is so significant. For performance, the LH2.2/M47 seems best. I have an A cam in a 3.1/M47 car and it will still do 29mpg in cruise mode.

Based mostly on John's twin cam swap (over which I drool every time I see a picture) I'm working on a twin cam swap for my wagon. Just "cuz", I'm seriously considering trying to get the 3.1 to run on that project.

DS






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.