The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

anti-sway bars vs coil covered shocks 200 1989

Just want to check out others opinions about “anti-sway bars” vs. “coil covered shocks“. I was watching one of those “fast n loud’ car programs, (I think it was “Fast ‘n Loud , not sure) They were talking about installing coil covered shocks vs. HD anti-sway bars.

The jist of it was that even though heavy duty anti-sway bars offer some support on the suspension inc cornering that the coil covered shocks where much better in that they held up on cornering much better and recovered far faster. They said that anti-sway bars are “too slow“. Reason I ask? I do have IPDs HD anti-sway bars front and back, and HD shocks, but what ”they” said perked my interest.

I'm not saying I will go right out and change over, but I’d at least like to know if the comment was valid and figured people here would have, hopefully, knowledgeable replies.

Thank you!






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.