The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Correction 700 1988

Not sure what specifically in the original post prompted this but I hope is is informative to those the flaunt older Volvo Safety. It was WAY ahead of its time in the 1960's-1980's..even the 1990's compared to many cars. If the SPECIFIC reason you are looking at an older Volvo is passive safety, please move on and look at a late 1990's or better Civic/Carolla/Camry/Accord.

I was reminded of this recently when an acquaintance was sandwiched so hard (closing speed of rear car in excess of 50 mph) in a 1993 240. Airbag worked. Crumple zones (circa 1974 with minor improvements in the early 1980's) did what then could and saved her life but at a cost of weeks in the hospital and continuing recovery.

I drive my red block Volvo for what it is:

Rugged
Durable
Rebuildable
Approachable as a DIY mechanic
Useful
And very, very good for ACTIVE safety






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.