The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

245 Exhaust 200

It was the cat with the flanges on both ends that threw me off. I realize now that the two previous cars I worked on had the later cat with the rear pipe attached.

I may be over-thinking this. The pipe behind the cat is very solid. The cat's bolts on the rear flange would have to be cut off if I were to replace it but that doesn't mean they won't hold it together if left alone. Like I stated earlier I'll take a hard look at the whole system this weekend and decide how far to go with it. (I consider the car a keeper but I can't tell you how many cars in my life I said that about)

Curious though if there are any gains in power or drivability by gutting or removing the cat. (or replacing it with new) There are no operational problems with the K-Jet system now.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.