The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

AW70 to AW71L swap 200 1992

I have just purchased an AW71L transmission which came off an accident-damaged 940 with about 150K miles on it. It wasn't expensive, and was a fun day out to go and get from the seller, who lives in a remote and scenic area. My question is, should I simply change the rear seal, fill it up with fluid and switch it out for the AW70 in my beautiful '92 240 wagon? Or should I have it rebuilt -- perhaps at least the valve body? The AW70 in my wagon shifts fine, but I do a fair bit of cruising over 50mph, and I like the idea of the lockup torque converter. My second 240, a '90 sedan shifts a little hard from 1st to 2nd, but is only used for dirty jobs/exposure to salt water from Kayaks on the roof. Maybe I should put the AW71L in this one? Its AW70 has shifted about the same for 7 years without getting worse. Decisions, decisions... what do you think?






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.