The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Re: M46 question. 200 1986

posted by  someone claiming to be Luke Healey on  Sun May 13 06:50 CST 2001 [RELATED]

Thanks guys,

All of these explainations are possible :)

I notice that the rear end is a little 'squishy'.. the car needs new suspension products, and the motor mounts are also softer than in either of my other two 240s

When you shut the car off, it has that little shake at the end, so I think I'll check out the motor/tranny mounts..

I just put new rotors on my 1991, and am going to have the old rotors turned, and use them on this 245. When I have all the tires off, I'll check out the suspension issues.

My 1982 242 has the M46 manual transmission, and about the most worn suspension out of all my cars, and it doesn't shake like that, but who knows :)

PS>. anyone want to buy a 242?? haha..





USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.