The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Re: OK -- a non-Volvo brainteaser.... 700 91

I would guess that the camber of the rail bed (ie banking) would help zero out the centrifugal forces on a trail going around a bend. The bank would have to be calibrated for a specific speed. That is a first order correction. The flanges ARE necessary to provide second order nudges - which become first order of the actual train speed is different enough from the rated bank speed.

The rotation of the motor-generator set is not central to the riddle. It would set up a gyration effect that would counter any attempt to twist the engine off that axis of rotation - ye old V x F stuff that you can verify with a spinning bicycle wheel. As the resultant reaction force is perendicular to the applied force, it won't help to counter the centrigugal force. It will push the train down or up depending on the direction of the turn.

IMHO, Bill






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.