The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Converting 164 Carbs 140-160 1969

posted by  someone claiming to be chris ulrich on  Mon Jun 10 22:31 CST 2002 [RELATED]


There's an article in the archive that says to the
effect that such a conversion doesn't work super
well. It looks like there is lots of manifold that
will get soaked in gasoline, especially since the
manifold is *not* designed to have fuel in it there
may be problems with pooling gas in weird places.
On the other hand, I've seen lots of american inline
sixes with manifolds that look like they'd be
pretty bad (like those slat six manifolds with one
carb).

Please let us know how this goes.
chris






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.