The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Turbo vs Non-Turbo the never ending struggle 200

I bought my first 240 about 6 months ago. 82 245 turbo 230K. I thought I'd be able to drive it a few years before doing any serious work on it. I was wrong. In 4000 miles I've had to do: Front end rebuild, wiring harness, starter, trailing arm bushings, blower motor, clutch and in-tank-pump. At first, I was really bummed out that the car needed so much work and considered selling it. Thanks to the advice and encouragement of the people on this board, I was able to fix all this stuff for less than $800 in parts and a few weekends getting greasey. I'm prepared that one day, I might need a turbo. Hell, I'm prepared to rebuild the engine if I have to. The car is that good. I looked at my buddies 80 242 today. Lotsa room in that engine compartment to work on stuff. The turbo definitely has more crap in there to get in your way but as Dave says, boost is fun, boost is worth it.

Bob
82 intercooled turbowagon 234K






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.