The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Smart decision. BTW..more on bent valves 200 1982

posted by  someone claiming to be rouleur on  Mon Nov 18 08:41 CST 2002 [RELATED]

Sounds like a smart decision, safety is always primo concern. Simple job for the mech, shouldn't cost too much.

We have a '91 Toyota Celica w/ many miles that's gonna need a t-belt--do you have any exp. w/such a vehicle? I have same question as you....this thing has a 1.6L 16 VALVE 4 cyl. and I've heard from >1 source it's a non-interference design.

Find that hard to believe w/ all that machinery in there. '83 Volvo is high tech to me.

No answer to question in Haynes book or toyota manual, only "change it at 60k mi." Haynes is at least right about B 21 and B 23 Volvo engines.

Frank in OH






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.