The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Progress, evolution, etc... 140-160 1968

Having the intakes on one side and the exhaust ports on the other allows them a little more room and they make less abrupt curves coming from the valves out to the manifold. And there is less mass in the valvetrain for the valve springs to return agsints. So higher revs and thus more power is a possibility with an OHC engine. Although it doesn't really seem like they take advantage of that ability, 16V versions possibly excepted. At the level of development they left the factory with there isn't much of an advantage.

On my PV engine I had an IPD lifter go bad on an IPD street perf cam. Can't really tell which one went bad first - typical flat lobe situation. The cam and lifters probably had about 25K miles or so on them.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.