The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Yup ! 140-160

posted by  someone claiming to be Al 260Z on  Mon Feb 10 14:32 CST 2003 [RELATED]

Even though I'm running dual DGVs on my 260Z (inline 6), I'd go for dual SUs if I was looking into a new setup. Much, much less hassle and expense than DCOEs, and probably a good bit less than DGVs also. I've heard that DCOEs set up for WOT can get terrible fuel economy.

SU's are a great performing carb with good part-throttle economy AND WOT performance. Probably one of the easiest carbs to self-maintain, rebuild, and tune. The only thing that's not self-repairable is worn throttle shaft and bushings.

Later,
Al






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.