The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Thermostat choice...cooler...better...?? 200 1990

The hotter the better up to a limit.

"My logic is lower the temp, less wear on the engine."

The opposite is true in a practical sense. When you run cool, you run rich. Gasoline (which, unlike diesel fuel, is a solvent) washes oil off the cylinder walls, increasing wear. And a cool engine is more likely to have the fuel mist condense on the cool cylinder walls than a hot engine.

"Less premature combustion (therefore less pinging and knocking)..."

Maybe, but only when you're in the proper temp zone. Too cool and you'll build up carbon, which can cause preignition.

"Because heat softens the metal thus allowing more steel molecules to rub off..."

Don't worry about that 'til things start glowing cherry red.
--
Don Foster (near Cape Cod, MA)






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.