The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Change to synthetic at 100K? 200 1992

well as with most daily driver engines its that old statement we used make about another product that was really big at the time....STP! one guy would say how great it is, another would say no diff.....and the crack we used to make was..."if it dont hurt it(the engine)put it in, if it helps it, that good!!!
i was in the air force 1965-69 and i worked as POL, petroleum, oils & lubricants. all of the jet engines took oil, govt spec was MIL 7808 SYNTHETIC OIL.
was alwasy told not get it on your skin, or accidently eat it(say you had some on your hands, and then ate a donut)was really bad stuff to humans. i belive that this auto synthetic aint far removed from that. iam no jet mechanic, but i know no internal combution engine will ever get to the temps that a jet runs, and that was the reason they used a syn oil...most petro based oils would be turned into smoke in a jet.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.