The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

1985 with 90 000 km vs. a 1990 with 170 000 km 200

hello all,

well, a quick request for advice from members of this informative message board.....i'm looking to buy a 240 and have narrowed it down to two cars....

The first is a 1985 with only 90 000 KM - not miles....the exterior is mint, the engine is clean and there are service records for brakes/calipers/regular rust-proofing/oil changes etc....The interior is decent but a little worn.....

The second is a 1990 DL with 170 000 KM - it is in very good condition - with good maintenance, minimal rust and a nicer interior - ac/heated seats/cassette deck etc all in working order.......

Question......Which one do I buy?
p.s. i'm looking to get three solid years out of either with minimal maintenance
thanks.......






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.