The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

LH2.4 vs LH3.1 200

Theoretically, the higher the version number, the more advanced, or better, the system should be.

In practice, I don't know that 3.1 is a quantum leap over 2.4. The only fundamental difference in makeup that I know of involves the AMM. LH 1.0 - 2.4 use a hot wire sensor, while 3.1 uses a hot film. I would *guess* that a hot film is a bit more robust than a hot wire.

This era was a mixed bag of LH versions (and Regina, too.) Turbos and NA motors did not change over at the same time, either. Best to look carefully at part numbers when you're grabbing stuff.
--
Speed Racer, '83 240 R, '74 164 E, '93 940 OL1 (Manchester, CT)






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.