The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

why would a volvo mechanic warn me away from the 90-92 yr. model 240's? 200

The problems with the 90-92 240's are such that your mechanic would not make as much money from you. Seriously, the 91-93 are the best of the breed. ABS was optional in '91 and standard after; 91-93 all have driver's air bag, and improved A/C system. I have a '91 with 110k and a '92 with 170K and they are well-behaved cars.

The 16-valve engine was allegedly a bit more of a headache, and the production run wasn't long enough (2-3 years) so parts are a little scarce. One guy I knew took care of his (from new) and never had a problem, but I personally would shy away from a 16-valve. It's an interference engine, so if you lose a timing belt things can get expen$ive fa$t.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.