The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Do I need new struts? 200 1989

In what way do you assess that the old ones were shot?

I recently replaced both my rear shocks and the front struts on my '86 240. All were original. The old units seemed to have about the same resistance to movement in and out as the new Sachs Advantage ( = Boge Turbo Gas). The only difference was that when I pushed in on the old ones, they would stay compressed, whereas the new ones would slowly push back to full extension.

I've wondered if this is an indication of being worn out, or if the original units were "basic hydraulic" as compared to the new units being "gas-charged"

Are the original units in an '86 240 non-turbo basic hydraulic, or gas charged? Do the 2 types react differently to being compressed (ie. should all units slowly push back to full extension when compressed)?






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.