The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Pros/cons of flushing high mileage tranny 200 1990

posted by  someone claiming to be jwalker on  Sat Mar 27 05:19 CST 2004 [RELATED]


Background:
My car has 233k. The AW-70 is original to the best of my knowledge. Tranny runs/works great with no issues.

It is time for a tranny fluid change. Previously I changed the fluid to synthetic ATF.

It has never received a flush since I have owned it. I know that most of you BB's are in favor of flushing. I have also read here that some of you think it isn't such a good idea.

I would like to get some opinions on both sides of the issue. What do you think gang? Should I do it or leave well enough alone and just change the fluid?


Thanks all,

Jim 90 244DL 233K






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.