The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

I second that last post... and 1800

posted by  iadr on  Sun Apr 4 18:14 CST 2004
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Wed Jan 1 18:39 CST 2014
[RELATED]

>My results (according to the paper from the head guy) was:

>Best flow stock intake was 190 cubes at 28" water at .4 lift
>best flow ported intake was 222 cubes at 28" at .4 lift

>best ext stock was 148 at .6 lift
>best ext ported was 172 at .6 lift

The exh flow kept increasing up to .6" ???

Figures seem about 10% high on intake and about 10-15% high on exhaust. I'm assuming he didn't use a bore fixture, which may account for that.

Interesting, though.


PS I'll try to get to replying to your email(s) this week





USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.