The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

960 'interference engine' 900

I think this may primarily be a consequence of three things:

1. The head being split into two sections along the cam centerlines.

2. The symmetric crossflow design with the plug in the center

3. 4 valves per cylinder

Because of these two things, they had to tilt the valve line out of a vertical position because there wasn't any room for the tops of the valves in that center region in the top cyl head section as the spark plug well was there, but the bottom of the valves did have to be in the combustion chamber.

There weren't a lot of things to change in the combustion chamber while fitting 4 valves in & trying to maintain good cylindrical symmetry with a minimum of discontinuities/obstructions. The end result was that the axis of the valves are angled at about 30° to the axis of the piston with the bottom quadrant of the valves sitting pretty close to lower surface of the lower head section & the top of the piston.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.