The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Bracket at the top of the differential 444-544 1959

I'm having trouble visualizing how that would affect the engine.

The main thing that linkage does is prevent the rear axle as a whole unit from turning in response to braking and accellerating. I think 444's didn't even have the linkage, they were just more securely attached to the diagonal arms which are the main fore/aft locators of the rear axle.

As the axle goes up and down the length of the rear section of the driveshaft does change, but that should be accomodated by the splines in the back section.

Are the bushings in the diagonal arms OK? Is the driveshaft perhaps slightly too long and the splined section alreay fully 'short'?






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.