The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

940-960 engine swap?? HELP!!! 900 1994

I don't see how a 960 could ever be more economical than a 940. More pleasureable, absolutely.

At the very least the engine has more spark plugs and wires to deal with. The wear items on the electronic transmission (lockup solenoid) sure seem more expensive than the wear items on the AW70 (OD relay and solenoid, check ball).

The early ones need timing belts more often, and the cost of parts is quite a bit more expensive than what's needed for an 8V red block.

If one wanted a four cylinder in a 960 body, get an 88-91 760 Turbo or 940SE/960 Turbo. Same dash, same suspension, four cylinder simplicity. If the 960 really did have a 3.31:1 rear end, I'd worry about how well a non-turbo four banger would be able to accelerate.

--
alex

'89 765T, 173,9xx mi






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.