The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

940 Turbo or Not 900

posted by  someone claiming to be K.P. Walsh on  Fri Jun 4 12:11 CST 2004 [RELATED]

If you are OK with the N/A stay with that, gas prices are not going
down anytime soon. I have owned both types, currently am slightly bitter
about only getting 230-250 miles per tank driving responsibily. Fortunately
the car is paid for and gas + insurance are only costs. Dont get me wrong, I
do enjoy the turbo. It pulls my family of five quite comfortably through
Wyoming and Colorado, my old 745 N/A was a bit of a dog on long mountain
passes. If I had to do it all over I probably would want 945 N/A ('94-'95)
Lower heat under hood, better fuel MPG, simpler engine, appliance quality
reliability with simple maintenance.

overall condition and maintenance records are most important considerations.
just my .02$





USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.