The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

940 Turbo or Not 900

Back in late 1994 when my wife and I were shopping for a new car, we were not even considering a Volvo (too much money we thought). We were retiring a 1985 diesel VW Jetta (btw 46 mpg!) with 102K. Had the chance to test drive identical 940's with and without turbo chargers. The price difference was about $1500 for the blower. You really feel that extra weight/horsepower ratio accelerating up the on ramp and merging with 65mph semi's on the interstate. When we bought the new Volvo my wife commented to our seven year old son: "you will probably be driving this when you turn 16"...we turned the keys over to him two months ago.

Face it people. why do we buy these out of style "bricks"? Because they are well designed and crafted vehicles that are really close to armored personel carriers for our families. Bottom line was: screw the fuel economy, give me the Swedish steel.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.