The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

New Knowledge! My day is complete. 200 1984

Yep, prime example of a none technical lawyer, Ralph Nader, making a name for himself by taking a defective study conducted by Ford and uing it to further his "cause". The car was later declared safe by the DOT but that never made the papers. Turns out the Ford test engineers were purposely causing the test car to flip by running under inflated tires and jerking the wheel while at the limit in turns.

In reality, the first series from '60 to '64 weren't the most stable cars but better than many. I love the second series, '65 to the end in '69 which with Corvett style rear suspension handled better than Porsches of that age. Mine is a '66 with the 140 HP engine. In '72 & '73 I managed to claim several autocross trophies against BMW 2002s, Datsun 510s etc. in local events with a mildly worked over car. The one I have now is a California car my son found and gave to me.
--
'96 965 with 16' wheels at 118K. Had '85 745 Turbo Diesel for 200K.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.