The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

K JET 120-130

I don't have any hands-on experience hopping up a K-jet motor, but my impression is that it adapts very easily to a wide range of applications. No reason I can't think of that raising CR would bother it in the least. Same for a hotter cam -- the K-cam was used as a compromise between power and emissions, not because the system couldn't accommodate more airflow.

Lee Cordner (VCOA Prez) has a *very* cleanly done K-jet 122... big-bore with D cam and a fair amount of head work, I believe, and it goes pretty well -- effortlessly outran my former B20E/SU setup at Thunderhill a few years back (that's no longer a possibility, I do believe). Here's a pic of him about to lap me:







USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.