The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

B23 vs B20 120-130

I assume that this subject matter may have been dealt with previously, but what still intrigues me is why Volvo would have progressed to an overhead cam engine. I know that the engine mountings, gearbox bellhousing, sump and waterpump would require adaptation for fitment into a 122.
My questions are:
1. Assuming that the adaptations above could be managed, and supposing that the bottom ends of the B23 and B20 are similar as far as crankshaft and conrods are concerned, which engine would perform and be tuned better?
2. Are there certain limitations to the B23 cylinderhead, which allows the B20 to be tuned better?
3. Would the engine noise levels be lower with the B23?
4. If the B23 engine is mounted upright, how will it affect the lubrication of the camshaft, if at all?

You kind assistance will be appreciated.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.