The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Cam Plug/Seal retainer isn't a 'solution'... 200

... nor is the cam seal plug meant to be a pop-off pressure release.

I've had that plug come out on a 200K+ 240 that always had a well-maintained flametrap system. A lot of oil was quickly lost at highway speeds.

I don't see any harm in a "retainer" to prevent such a potential disaster.

I suspect there are many uninformed Volvo drivers with clogged flame traps. I don't say we should ignore the PCV system, but IMO, weeping seals are a less severe penalty for such neglect than dumping oil from the rear cam plug.

I might think differently if I'd ever seen, or even heard of, a confirmed case of all seals being "blown out" by excessive crankcase pressure. Based on 40+ years with Volvos, seeing is believing.

--
Bruce Young
'93 940-NA (current) — 240s (one V8) — 140s — 122s — since '63.






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.