The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Girling or ATE on '74 160 140-160

i have a '74 164 E that i had to switch out the front axle assy. because i bent the original crossmember. i just took off the old assy.(crossmember, a-frames, springs, shocks, roters, etc.) and put on the one from my 142 since the construction of the parts except, of course the springs, etc., is the same. i have yet to put the original 160 springs back in, so the front end is sitting rather low on the 140 springs. but my real question is this: Would it be better to just use the girlings that are on the 140 axle assy., or to switch back in the ATEs when i do the spring transfer. note that this means buying new pads for the ATEs because they are almost gone. the ATEs are vented, with the slots in the middle, and the Girlings are solid discs but with a slightly larger diameter or width. so, yah, which brake setup would be better? or does it even make that much of a difference?
--
'71 142S (parts), '71 144S, '74 164E






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.