The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Cam Theory 1800

Yes I have a (nearly) new C-cam. The C does exactly the same thing, but since you need to look exactly perpendicular and with the lobe and cam both beeing 100% flat, there is no use of making a pic: you cannot make it visable in a camera. When looking along side of the lifter you can see how the contact area moves to the side of the lifter, and therefore decreases in size, and thus creating the wear patterns I posted. This can also not be made visable in pictures, which is why I made some drawings.
If you say this is not true, and the contact stays in the middle of the lifter, it would result in a 1:1 valve lobe shape vs. lifter action. As is concluded before this is NOT the case.
All I can say is, please check it, and you'll see what is actually happeing down there.

Cheers, Ben

--
P131, '65, B20B+M47. P131, '69, B20E+AW71L+LSD. (www.tinustechniek.tk)






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.