|
This post received 6 replies so far - thank you for all.
Re. the fuel economy tangent that's been discussed - - -
nearly any other newer mid-size or smaller front-drive car will get better gas mileage than a rear-drive Volvo. The real mileage champs don't provide as much safety as I'd like, and the remaining contenders are so close to the 940's in mpg that I'm willing to overlook the difference.
Spending that much time driving, I really want a safe, protective car. No tin box for me!
I don't like giving up 8-10% of my fuel economy to 4-wheel drive. Rear drive with 2 or 4 snows has been great for 10 years of New England winters.
Of the current high-reliability cars, I think that only the Toyota Camry/Solara are contenders in terms of safety. If not for the waste of 4WD, 4Runner and Rav4 would be contenders (quite safe by the IIHS Driver Fatality statistics, see www.iihs.org). Subaru is a reliability contender but not a safety one. Honda Accord is apparently nearly as safe as Camry, but not as easy to work on.
Takes me back to 940's and Camry's.
While we're on the topic, the hybrid engines get their best mpg in city driving. On the highway, they're not too different from a regular engine of similar power. And of course, you can't yet buy them for just a couple thousand dollars.
So that seems to bring it around to a 940 or a Camry if I'll change models from 240's.
|