The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

Alternative solution 900

It is a risk, yes. But it's a cost/benefit tradeoff.

I use my Honda for commuting 45KM round trip to work in outskirts of Vancouver. The cost for using my Honda is I am my prone to injury should I get in an accident. I drive carefully and responsibly (as do most others) and estimate my risk (cost) to be minimal.

The benefit is decreased fuel and maintenance costs. The Honda is WAY cheaper to operate vs the Volvo. A few contributing factors in my case include expensive Volvo anything in our area + the Accord is older and will not depreciate any more.

My wife uses the Volvo to cart the kids around. For that, I'm happy to spend the extra $$ to have her in a safe vehicle.
--
Norm Cook Vancouver BC; 1989 745T 204,000KM






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.