The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

240 M47 Transmissions 200

posted by  Erling on  Wed Jun 29 23:11 CST 2005
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Wed May 22 00:57 CST 2013
[RELATED]

FWIW: I have read "somewhere" that the type II came in 1986, in which case both your transmissions should be the stronger versions. The problem with type I was related to lubrication, it is common practise in my neck of the wood to overfill as a sort of compensation.

The only thing I can think of that might be worth looking into, is that your 1990 has a Hardy disc between box and axle, the 1987 has not (change in 1988). I'd check if the holes etc. match when mixing years, but I'd be surprised if they didn't. Which admittedly isn't worth much; I get surprised all the time.

Erling.
--
My 240 Page






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.