The message to which you are about to reply is shown first. GO TO REPLY FORM



 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

142 Radiator 140-160

Oh just a note on cooling. If you are trying to lower weight AND have better cooling, an aluminum radiator may not get much more weight reduction than the stock radiator because the overall weight of the radiator is going to be governed by it's capacity and the volume of fluid. The radiator isn't going to have much to add or subtract, maybe a pound or less.
The aluminum radiator will certainly improve cooling given the same surface area as brass, so to get a weight reduction you would need to get an aluminum radiator that has the same cooling capacity as the brass stock one, but a smaller area (kind of a catch 22, I don't recomend it!).
You should also consider the coolant flow and match the stock system to prevent cavitation which will damage the engine.
If I were you, I wouldn't be concerned by weight reducion but greater cooling capacity. One area I wouldn't cut corners or pounds on.
--
'89 245 Sportwagon, '04 V70 2.5T Sportwagon






USERNAME
Use "claim to be" below if you don't want to log in.
PASSWORD
I don't have an account. Sign me up.
CLAIM TO BE
Use only if you don't want to login (post anonymously).
ENTER CAPTCHA CODE
This is required for posting anonymously.
OPTIONS notify by email
Available only to user accounts.
SUBJECT
MODEL/YEAR
MESSAGE

DICTIONARY
LABEL(S) +
IMAGE URL *
[IMAGE LIBRARY (UPLOAD/SELECT)]

* = Field is optional.

+ = Enter space delimited labels for this post. An example entry: 240 muffler


©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.