Volvo RWD Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 7/2003

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

240 versus 850

posted by  matt b on  Thu Jul 10 06:30 CST 2008
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Tue Oct 14 16:33 CST 2014
[RELATED]

YIKES....

Those both seem way, way overpriced. Cut both prices in half and you'll still be paying top dollar.

THat said.. we've had two 850 turbos. Both automatics admittedly, but both had tranny problems at a bit over 100k miles. As well as engine issues in one, a heater core in the other.

We currently have two 240s. Both at about 290k, and neither has had any significant drivetrain issues.

850s simply do not hold up as well as 240s.

Either can be costly to have fixed... I bet the 240 would be a bit better in that regard though.

Were I you... I'd keep shopping.

--
-Matt I ♥ my ♂






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New 240 versus 850
posted by  revjim  on Thu Jul 10 02:28 CST 2008 >
  • New 240 versus 850
    posted by  eyyu  on Thu Jul 10 05:22 CST 2008 >
    • New NO
      posted by  245DogWaggin  on Thu Jul 10 06:16 CST 2008 >
      • New NO
        posted by  eyyu  on Thu Jul 10 06:24 CST 2008 >
        • New Yes
          posted by  will rehsper subscriber  on Thu Jul 10 07:22 CST 2008 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.