Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 8/2008 200 INDEX

[<<] [>>]

VIEW

REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE

Replies to this message will be emailed.

SAVE

What tranny problems? 200 1988

posted by KlausC on Sat Feb 13 13:10 CST 2010
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS]

[IGNORE ALL POSTS]

last visit: Fri Oct 24 10:15 CST 2014

[RELATED]

Please do not compare the BW35 with the 'new' AW 5 speed slush boxes. None of the automatics have ever been good past 100K without a lot of flushing. And why is there an overdrive button for the 240 AT? What a pain.

My 220 has a 4 speed MT with an overdrive, but that actually feels like an overdrive. And the switch on the steering column is better placement.

But Volvo stopped making the 120 series cars because they couldn't meet safety standards with that design. Newer Volvos just get 'safer' and are ahead of the other manufactures, except Mercedes which costs too much to buy and maintain.

Klaus
--
Proud owner of a 220S. If I had more room, I would have more Volvos.

THREADED

THREADED EXPANDED

FLAT

PRINT ALL

MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
posted by shmule05 on Sun Jan 24 13:08 CST 2010 >

safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
posted by Volvo240Skunk37 on Sun Jan 24 14:05 CST 2010 > V
- safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
  posted by joekidd on Mon Jan 25 00:11 CST 2010 > V
  - safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
    posted by someone claiming to be klus on Mon Jan 25 01:34 CST 2010 > V

safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
posted by Jorrell on Sun Jan 24 14:44 CST 2010 > V
- safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
  posted by Jac912 on Mon Jan 25 01:48 CST 2010 > V
  - safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
    posted by Jorrell on Mon Jan 25 10:53 CST 2010 > V
  - safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
    posted by Laine subscriber on Mon Jan 25 15:39 CST 2010 > V
    - safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
      posted by someone claiming to be wma45 on Tue Jan 26 07:32 CST 2010 > V

safety compared to newer cars - sad to say, poor [200][1988]
posted by V7driver on Sun Jan 24 14:49 CST 2010 > V

safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
posted by weather subscriber on Sun Jan 24 16:00 CST 2010 > V

safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
posted by Steve subscriber on Sun Jan 24 16:37 CST 2010 > V
- safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
  posted by Stickbuilder subscriber on Mon Jan 25 02:44 CST 2010 > V
  - safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
    posted by hardknocks! subscriber on Mon Jan 25 14:36 CST 2010 > V
  - safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
    posted by Steve subscriber on Wed Jan 27 01:15 CST 2010 > V

Biggest issue is integrity. [200][1988]
posted by David Johnson on Sun Jan 24 20:03 CST 2010 > V

safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
posted by yama on Mon Jan 25 01:08 CST 2010 > V
- safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
  posted by Ryan_R subscriber on Mon Jan 25 04:22 CST 2010 > V
  - safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
    posted by yama on Mon Jan 25 05:14 CST 2010 > V
    - safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
      posted by Ryan_R subscriber on Mon Jan 25 06:06 CST 2010 > V
    - safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
      posted by weather subscriber on Mon Jan 25 08:37 CST 2010 > V
      - safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by yama on Mon Jan 25 12:58 CST 2010 > V
        
        safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by punk240 on Mon Jan 25 13:15 CST 2010 > V
        
        safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by Jorrell on Mon Jan 25 13:55 CST 2010 > V
        
        safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by pageda on Mon Jan 25 14:00 CST 2010 > V
        
        safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by Jorrell on Mon Jan 25 14:20 CST 2010 > V
        
        safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by pageda on Mon Jan 25 14:48 CST 2010 > V
        
        safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by yama on Mon Jan 25 14:15 CST 2010 > V
        
        safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by weather subscriber on Mon Jan 25 16:03 CST 2010 > V
        
        safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by yama on Tue Jan 26 01:27 CST 2010 > V
        
        safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by weather subscriber on Tue Jan 26 06:35 CST 2010 > V
        
        safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by yama on Tue Jan 26 08:49 CST 2010 > V
        
        safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by weather subscriber on Tue Jan 26 09:39 CST 2010 > V
        
        safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by someone claiming to be klus on Tue Jan 26 09:56 CST 2010 > V
        
        safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by weather subscriber on Tue Jan 26 10:22 CST 2010 > V
        
        safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by yama on Wed Jan 27 04:54 CST 2010 > V
        
        safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by Ryan_R subscriber on Tue Jan 26 07:46 CST 2010 > V
    - safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
      posted by David Johnson on Tue Jan 26 17:45 CST 2010 > V
      - safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
        posted by yama on Wed Jan 27 01:02 CST 2010 > V
  - safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
    posted by ridesR100RS on Mon Jan 25 07:40 CST 2010 > V
    - safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
      posted by Volvodad subscriber on Sat Feb 13 11:32 CST 2010 > V
      - Duplicate Post - NMI [200][1988]
        posted by Volvodad subscriber on Sat Feb 13 11:32 CST 2010 > V
- safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
  posted by David Johnson on Tue Jan 26 17:35 CST 2010 > V
  - safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
    posted by yama on Wed Jan 27 01:15 CST 2010 > V

safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
posted by benski on Mon Jan 25 04:56 CST 2010 > V

safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
posted by Ryan_R subscriber on Mon Jan 25 05:03 CST 2010 > V
- safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
  posted by benski on Mon Jan 25 05:10 CST 2010 > V

Define safe and new [200][1988]
posted by KlausC subscriber on Mon Jan 25 05:48 CST 2010 > V
- Define safe and new [200][1988]
  posted by NZ 240GLE on Sat Feb 13 10:26 CST 2010 > V
  - What tranny problems? [200][1988]
    posted by KlausC subscriber on Sat Feb 13 13:10 CST 2010 > V

I walked away from a 3x roll over at 70mph [200][1988]
posted by punk240 on Mon Jan 25 09:22 CST 2010 > V

safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
posted by Trev29 on Mon Jan 25 23:59 CST 2010 > V

safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
posted by someone claiming to be volvoid on Tue Jan 26 03:01 CST 2010 > V
- safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
  posted by cerbie on Tue Jan 26 04:55 CST 2010 > V

safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
posted by tallnikita on Tue Jan 26 11:17 CST 2010 > V

safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
posted by Will740turbo subscriber on Tue Jan 26 18:10 CST 2010 > V

safety compared to newer cars [200][1988]
posted by oscarcat on Thu Jan 28 18:36 CST 2010 > V
- Check www.crashtest.com for car safety comparisions [200][1988]
  posted by jwalker on Fri Jan 29 04:17 CST 2010 > V

<< < > >>

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.

Volvo RWD/200 Forum Index

Community Forums:

RWD

AWD

GATHERINGS

OPINIONS

PICKNPULL

V8

STORIES

Classifieds

Site Features

RWD Series/Models

AWD Series/Models

Volvo RWD 200 Forum

What tranny problems? 200 1988