Volvo RWD 140-160 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 12/2003 140-160 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE    PRINT   SAVE 

Automatic vs Manual (160) 140-160

My own opinion having owned three 164's--a 4-speed, 4-speed w/od and an auto and have driven many auto equipped 164's--the the power of the 6 masks the limitations of the very basic BW35. That was a transmission used in many European imports--mostly with 4 cylinder motors. There's no question the auto made the those cars more sluggish than the stick shift versions. There's no problem in that regard with the 164--it has lots of torque and will get you up to highway speed without straining. The 1975 model may be saddled with pollution control devices. Stick or auto the 164 is no economy car -- expect at best 15-18 mpg-tolerable I guess as a weekend ride. There's a high pleasure factor with the 164. -- Dave






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New Automatic vs Manual (160) [140-160]
posted by  Shaughnessy  on Sat May 18 20:36 CST 2013 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.