The newest 240s are 1993 models. The newest 940s are 1995. That leaves the 960s through 1998--but they're sort of complicated, have an interference engine with a serious design flaw (two-part head, leaks oil onto the timing belt, belt breaks, engine lunches...) and there aren't very many of them. That's the end of the line.

I would stay away from 4-wheel drive. More expensive parts to maintain and/or replace. Same for hybrids--great idea, but they have TWO power sources with separate issues plus lots of computer management. Can't be good for long term durability and DIY.

Engine bay accessibity is a big factor for DIY. Ford Ranger? Too bad there isn't a wagon version with a V6 and a stick. I guess in theory you can get and Explorer with a stick but I've never seen one. Plus there are the claims about rollovers. Plus the new generation Explorer is bloated--over 4,000 lbs. It's an Expedition wannabe.

Lexus may be very high initial quality but what is the DIY coefficient of the 400 series? I've never looked under the hood of one. Comments, anyone?

Lincoln LS? No stick. Good handling, rear drive yes? They've been out a few years--any reports on long-term reliability?

A car nut I know recommends the Mercedes E-series. That's the middle size one. The owner of the indy shop I use says STAY AWAY from the V-8s esp from 1994 on.

Passat? They are all either a turbo (more parts) or a V6 (engine access problems). But you can get a stick.

Right now there just isn't an obvious successor to the brick. Take care of the ones you own--they may be the last of the real cars.

My brick fantasy: improved battery capacity lets me yank the entire power system and go electric. If you add up every single component that is part of the power system, that's a lot of weight. Plenty of room for a big ole motor and batteries. Rear drive, electric AC (maybe a window unit?) same car, smooooooth...

Doug Harvey