Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 9/2009 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

The one difference ... 200

I've read here, and on other posts, how great the 700/900 cars compared to the 240. And you've got good objective arguments, e.g., SIPPs and side-impact protection, as well as a subjective one (e.g., the ride is smoother).

But the thing that keeps me and my wife in 240's is the seating! With the seats adjusted to their highest level, we're able to sit bolt upright, like in our SUV (which we only use to pull our largest boat, beyond the 240's rating). Unfortunately, in the 700/900 cars, we feel like we're sitting on the pavement -- we've tried them out, and they're just too low, and too reclined! Sure, not as low as many other cars, but not as upright as 240s. For a few years, we even had a couple of M-B's (300E), but that, too, was too low, and I found I had a stiff back after a long drive. I can drive all day in my 240s and step out and feel great (well, good) -- couldn't say that about my 300E's (which I finally sold off).






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New new volvo? opinions on the 900 series [200]
posted by  Laine subscriber  on Mon Feb 28 09:55 CST 2005 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.