Volvo RWD 200 Forum

INDEX FOR 1/2026(CURRENT) INDEX FOR 6/2008 200 INDEX

[<<]  [>>]


 VIEW    REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE Replies to this message will be emailed.    PRINT   SAVE 

2.4 vs 2.2 200

posted by  NJC on  Fri Jul 29 06:40 CST 2005
Author: [PROFILE] [EVERY POST] [THREADS] [BEST POSTS] RSS Feed     [IGNORE ALL POSTS]
last visit: Sun Jul 24 13:42 CST 2011
[RELATED]

Are you saying that due to last year of a successful run with LH2.2? Next year ('89) for the NA 240 was LH 2.4

I'm never to eager to buy the first year of anything ... one of the reasons I'm happy to have the last year of LH 2.2 in the '89 745T. At least most of the bugs should have been worked out. Operative word is "should" of course.
--
Norm Cook; Vancouver BC; 1989 745T 208,000KM






THREADED THREADED EXPANDED FLAT PRINT ALL
MESSAGES IN THIS THREAD

New 3.1 vs 2.4 lh [200]
posted by  hardknocks! subscriber  on Thu Jul 28 09:24 CST 2005 >


<< < > >>



©Jarrod Stenberg 1997-2022. All material except where indicated.


All participants agree to these terms.

Brickboard.com is not affiliated with nor sponsored by AB Volvo, Volvo Car Corporation, Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. or Ford Motor Company. Brickboard.com is a Volvo owner/enthusiast site, similar to a club, and does not intend to pose as an official Volvo site. The official Volvo site can be found here.